Thursday, July 18, 2013

This Day in Utah Gay History July 18th

 July 18th
1897 From the Bugler of Yesterday, Thursday Night, the young tramps that were arrested in Corrine the other day broke jail.  They were not confined in cells so they broke up through the ceiling into the old shop over the jail, let themselves down into the jail yard and by means of pole climbed over the high wall and away they went. At last accounts they were still at large. These are the youthful villains who a few days at Corinne perpetrated that “Crime Against Nature” on that little runaway lad from Salt Lake. Ogden Standard Examiner Brigham Notes page 2

Add caption
1966 VANGUARD was formed as a militant hippie-Gay youth group created in San Francisco, CA and had a hippie drop out program for Gay street youths. It was  political in the tone of the early Hippies and didn't survive long. Vanguard's first major political action was on July 18, when a picket line outside a San Francisco restaurant chain called Compton's to protest this discrimination three years before the more famous rebellion at New York's Stonewall Inn.  The homosexual residents of the Tenderloin rioted against police oppression at the popular all-night restaurant, Compton's Cafeteria. Many of the militant hustlers and street queens involved in the riot were members of Vanguard, the first known Gay youth organization in the United States, which had been organized earlier that year with the help of radical ministers working with Glide Memorial Methodist Church, a center for progressive social activism in the Tenderloin for many years.

1974 The Mormon doctrine of not allowing blacks to hold
the Mormon Priesthood brought the Boy Scouts into a serious confrontation with the NAACP. The Boy Scouts of America do not discriminate because of religion or race, but Mormon-sponsored troops had a policy of discrimination. On July 18, 1974, the Salt Lake Tribune reported: "A 12-year-old boy scout has been denied a senior patrol leadership in his troop because he is black, Don L. Cope, black ombudsman for the state, said Wednesday.... "The ombudsman said Mormon 'troop policy is that in order for a scout to become a patrol leader, he must be a deacon's quorum president in the LDS Church. Since the boy cannot hold the priesthood, he cannot become a patrol leader. 

1987- An AIDS benefit was held at at Backstreet, a Gay club located at 108 South 5th West  in Salt Lake City UT

1988 Two female marines were relieved of duty for having a "lenient attitude toward homosexuality." They had testified on behalf of a woman being court martialed for lesbianism as character witnesses. 


1988 The National Center for Health Statistics announced that in 1987, AIDS had been the 15th leading cause of death in America. President Reagan's newly-founded National AIDS Commission released a report with over 500 recommendations for addressing the epidemic. A presidential advisor reduced the list to 10 items. The U.S. Surgeon General and the CDC mailed a brochure, "Understanding AIDS," to all U.S. households. It was the first and only national mailing of its kind.

1995 Tuesday, Removal of protections from employment section of code is still on track.  S.L. COUNTY MAY LEAVE HALF OF DISCRIMINATION LAW AS IS  By Brooke Adams, Staff Writer The lone Democrat on the Salt Lake County Commission apparently has persuaded his colleagues to back off one of two proposed changes to the county's anti-discrimination law. The county planned Wednesday to consider amending the anti-discrimination provisions for employment and delivery of services. The changes would have removed a listing of specifically protected classes. The classes are age, marital status, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, race and religion. Instead the county planned to add language saying it would abide by state and federal laws governing discrimination. The problem is that neither state nor federal law regards "marital status" and "sexual orientation" as protected classes. The Gay and Lesbian Utah Democrats planned to protest changes to both sections of the county's code. But at the urging of Commissioner Randy
Randy Horiuchi
Horiuchi, the commission apparently has agreed to leave intact the anti-discrimination provision governing delivery of services. "It's much like the mail carrier that didn't want to deliver to people with AIDS," Horiuchi said. People who work for the county should never discriminate in service delivery." Changes to the employment section are still on track. And that has the gay and lesbian community alarmed. "When you refuse employment and services to certain citizens, you're bound to save some tax dollars," said David Nelson, group founder. "But it's unfair discrimination nonetheless." Nelson, who works for the county, helped draft the anti-discrimination provisions three years ago. Commission Chairman Brent Overson said the county's intent is not to foster discrimination. The county is concerned that anti-
David Nelson
discrimination provisions currently in its code could expose it to lawsuits from employees, particularly when it comes to insurance benefits. "We're opening ourselves up to interpretation," said David Marshall, associate director of Community and Support Services. "We don't want to be the entity that is opening up the question. We feel it's appropriate to obey the laws of the state and federal government in these areas." Horiuchi and former commissioner Jim Bradley had just the opposite inclination when they approved the anti-discrimination provisions in 1992. "I think it is important for Salt Lake County to take the lead in preventing discrimination in hiring practices," Horiuchi said. "We felt the classes we annunciated in there were important to protect from discrimination." Horiuchi said preventing discriminatory practices should override concerns about litigation. But, Horiuchi said, it was never the intent that an outcome of the provision would be broadened insurance coverage for partners of county employees that might be protected by the anti-discrimination law.  A female county employee already has broached the question, however. The employee sued the county after it denied insurance coverage to her live-in boyfriend. Nelson claims the county is pursuing the changes in the anti-discrimination code at the behest of ultraconservatives, cloaking the action as a "fiscal responsibility." "There have been no complaints about these laws in the three years since they were adopted except from radical right groups," Nelson said.  
  • 1995 The Salt Lake Tribune S.L. County Hiring Plan Angers Gays By Jay Baltezore A Utah gay and lesbian group says it will launch an economic boycott of Salt Lake County if the county approves a controversial change in its hiring ordinance. But county officials say they are only trying to protect against costly lawsuits by unmarried employees who improperly claim county insurance benefits. On Wednesday, the County Commission is expected to pass an amendment to an anti-discrimination ordinance that would remove marital status and sexual orientation as protected categories for county employment. The suggested changes came from the County Attorney's Office. The intent is to protect the county from frivolous lawsuits, not to discriminate, says Salt Lake County Commission Chairman Brent Overson.
David Nelson
"To suggest that we will fire people based on [sexual orientation] is ridiculous," he says. "The last thing we want to do is for this to come across as gay-bashing." But David Nelson, a county employee and founder of the political-action  committee Gay and Lesbian Utah Democrats, says the move "will give all the employment officers and division directors the authority to fire and discriminate against their gay and lesbian employees. There are no problems with the [existing] law. No one has abused it." 
Overson argues that the potential for lawsuits is exactly why the county wants the law changed. This year, Salt Lake County filed fraud charges against a female employee who filed a health-insurance claim for her live-in boyfriend. That woman now is suing the county in federal court. There is no evidence other unmarried county employees have demanded insurance coverage for live-in partners. But Overson says the county wants to protect itself against gay or lesbian couples who may try to press the issue. Commissioner Randy Horiuchi says he objects to taking marital status and sexual orientation off the list of protected categories. If the County Commission approves the amendment, Nelson says, it will pay via a boycott similar to the one organized after Colorado voters in 1992 approved an amendment to that state's constitution prohibiting civil-rights protections based on sexual orientation.  "There might be many of us contacting the the Salt Lake County Convention and Visitors Bureau," Nelson says. "We will attach a dollar figure to it."

1997- The Dolores Chase Art Gallery in Salt Lake hosted a fund raising benefit for the Utah Stonewall Center with about 250 people in attendance.

1998-Representatives from 36 organizations met in Denver Colorado to discuss plans to work for equality on a state-by-state basis.

1998-South African Gays  threw a party to celebrate the 80th birthday of Nelson Mandela to recognize his contributions toward making South Africa the only country whose constitution recognizes the rights of Gay men and women.

2003 Correspondence regarding community center reneging on commitment to the Utah Stonewall historical Society in regards to its Pride Partnership agreement
  • Mark Swonson to Ben Williams and Chad Keller Subject: Pride Partners  Hi Chad and Ben- Well I sent another e-mail concerning the Pride Partners and still no response. This was my second e-mail sent to them regarding this matter. Also, I talked to someone else and they are supposed to contact them too. Maybe Ben you should send an e-mail regarding this matter and see if you get a response from them. I have  written to Paula [Wolfe] both times. Last time she was quick to respond and now nothing. Chad, you can watch and see what unfolds.... Mark:-)
  • Subject: Pride Partners Mark Swonson to Ben Williams Ben- I thought that was great what you wrote to Charles [Milne]. I am trying to think who else to put pressure on the Pride Inc. I know I think I will write Paul [Canuto] from UGRA and ask him if has had any response from them.     Mark:-)
2003 Subject: Lunch today, Beach Sunday Michael Aaron I'll see many of you at Naked Lunch today. This may be our best turnout yet, with many newcomers.  Sunday's Beach excursion: Meet at the Saltair parking lot off of I-80 (Saltair Exit) between 11:45 and noon. We will leave the parking lot at 12:05pm. We can carpool from there or you can follow us out. Any car will make it, you do not need a 4x4 or a high-profile vehicle. If you want to drive out separately, just find the group of naked guys with a white Jeep and a rainbow kite (if the breeze is up - which it will be - it always is). Bring lots of water, a towel, maybe a lawn chair. If you have a volleyball net and ball, or some other beach-type fun stuff, please bring it along!  NOTE: This is not the beach that many have heard about that is off of I-80 at the 7200 West exit. The former Bare Ass Beach is difficult to drive without a 4x4, is more about sex than nudity, and nude people are prone to arrest at that beach. BURMESTER IS NONE OF THOSE THINGS (not to say that sex doesn't happen out there).See you all there! -JeepNekkid

  • 2003 Friday Subject: Naked Lunch at JeepNekkid's Michael Aaron: Naked Lunch at JeepNekkid's  Friday July 18, 2003 12:00 pm - 1:30 pm  This event does not repeat.  Event Location: West Capitol Hill neighborhood.  Notes: Bring a lunch (if you want) and something to drink. Enjoy lunch out on the deck with a bunch of naked guys. Hot tub, shade, sun, hammock, bbq.


2009 On July 18, the Rose Wagner Performing Arts Center will be taken over by boobs.Well, a performance about boobs, anyway. The evening will mark the fifth anniversary of The Breast Dialogues, an annual evening of humorous, sober, sexy and uplifting monologues by local women (cisgender and transgender) about these physical endowments that play such a big role in women’s lives from youth to old age. In years past, monologues have focused on topics from the awkwardness of developing breasts to the The show’s structure is inspired by playwright Eve Ensler’s groundbreaking work, The Vagina Monologues, which got women across the world talking about issues directly related to the
Jennifer Nuttall
part of their anatomy that many still see as dirty.
Jennifer Nuttall, the Utah Pride Center’s Adult Programs Director, said she hopes that The Breast Dialogues (which the center co-sponsors) will do the same thing for women’s breasts that Ensler’s play did for their vaginas. Especially when it comes to the topic of breast cancer, which affects thousands of women in America and which lesbian, bisexual and transgender women are at higher risk of getting. In fact, the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation, which co-sponsors the performance along with the Center, gave the Center the grant in 2004 that made the first Dialogues possible. The grant, said Nuttall, was intended to educate women, most notably lesbians and bisexuals, about their particular risk factors. “I think [The Breast Dialogues] has been one of the most effective ways to bring awareness about breast cancer to the lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, because it’s a very entertaining and fun way to come and bond with other people around stories about our breasts,” she said. “Everyone has some experience with their breasts and there’s that experience we can relate to.” Along with the camaraderie this evening of theatre inspires, Nuttall also noted that The Breast Dialogues combines entertainment with important education about breast cancer, mammograms, self-examinations and other things women need to know to detect potential tumors early. “I think we all have some fear,” she continued. “Everyone knows someone who has gotten breast cancer, and to have that environment [the play encourages] to bring up that fear and then to have some resources, can be helpful. This has been a really effective way to bring that [information] to the community.” When asked what risk factors lesbian, bisexual and transgender women and men face that their straight and cisgender (non-transgender) do not, Nuttall named not seeking screenings (like mammograms) frequently. “[Lesbians, bisexual women and transgender women and men] don’t go and seek care as often and there are a lot of reasons for that. Part of that is the fear of discrimination in health care settings.” To help alleviate this fear, Nuttall said the Center has created a list of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender-affirming health care providers — each of whom are recommended to the Center by at least one individual patient. “It’s really important to disclose your sexual orientation to your provider, and we try to provide information [to help facilitate] that,” she said. “Gaining that trust is important and helps you to follow through with the steps [they recommend].” Breast Dialogues veteran Laurie Wood is serving as the facilitator for the
show’s 2009 incarnation, helping the participating women write and hone their monologues. One participant, she said is writing about her fears of getting breast cancer after watching her mother go through it. “Now she’s getting to the age where she’s having to worry [about getting it],” Wood said. But while _The Breast Dialogues_ has served as a vehicle for breast cancer education and prevention, the show has never been all about the disease, and neither will it be this year. “There’s one woman who recently went through breast reduction surgery, so her story is about how having very large breasts impacted so many aspects of her life and reflected on how she saw herself,” said Wood. “Then there’s another story of a woman who has equally large breasts and it’s her celebration of those breasts.” Nor are cisgender women the only ones interested in writing. “There are a couple of women [who have come to the monologue workshops] who are in the process of transitioning — one from male to female and one from female to male, and that perspective is really interesting. One is looking forward to getting rid of breasts and the other looking forward to getting breasts.” “A lot of the stories are about — they’re almost every woman’s stories about insecurities that come with our breasts and how much meaning gets invested in them either through our families or siblings or girlfriends or boyfriends. They’re just fraught with meaning,” she added. Although The Breast Dialogues workshops draw a number of women each year, both Nuttall and Wood said they are concerned they won’t have enough new pieces for a show (the piece typically features 10 monologues). Because of the shortage, they have said that a few “favorites from years past” may re-appear in 2009’s line up. But no matter what pieces get used, Wood promised an incredible evening of theatre. “Every single time, the whole becomes so terrific you couldn’t even plan it better, and it’s all sort of random,” she said.  Nobody plans a story line through the whole evening but it’s so amazing how it comes together.” The Breast Dialogues will be held at the Rose Wagner’s Studio Theatre on July 18 at 7:00 p.m. Tickets are a suggested donation of $10 to pay for renting the space. Breast cancer information will be available after the show as will light refreshments, provided by lesbian social and civic group sWerve. Shellie Waters will direct.

2010 Ina Mae Murri (1935 – 2010) & Stella Lopez-Armijo (1934 – 2010)  Updates on Funeral
Stella Lopez-Armijo & Ina Mae Murri
Information & Memorial Page by David Melson
  18 July 2010 With deep sadness we announce that we have received word that Ina Mae Murri and her partner Stella Lopez-Armijo passed away this weekend following an automobile accident in Southern Idaho. Ina Mae led Affirmation in 1986, and was a great inspiration to many of us in Affirmation. She was recipient of the Mortensen Award in 1989. We will have more information and a tribute page later this week.  Sincerely, David Melson Executive Director Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons

  • Lesbian and Mormon by Ina Mae Murri Originally published in Peculiar People: Mormons and Same-Sex Orientation Picture the typical small Mormon town of the 1940s and 1950s. In Idaho and Utah such towns were over 90 percent Mormon. Families were large, usually with six or more children. Mothers stayed home and reared their offspring in a sheltered environment. The awareness of pioneer heritage was strong, and many were from polygamous backgrounds. Education was favored, and almost everyone graduated from high school. Those who could went on to Ricks College or Brigham Young University. A few ventured even "farther away" to study or work in Salt Lake City or California. Teenage marriages were common, and the cycle continued. Like many others I came from just such a background. However, I did not come out of the experience like most others. I am lesbian. In order to explain how I came to an understanding of my homosexuality, I must tell you something about myself. I am the eighth of nine children. My parents were of pioneer stock. They were married in the Mormon temple. I consider my upbringing to be in no significant way different from the others in my family. As I recall my childhood and teenage years, I wanted what my peers did, and I had the same role models. If anything, my family emphasized the church rules more than did many of my friends' families. I daydreamed of boys, dating, and marriage. I dated some, but on a deeper level I realized years later that my strongest feelings were for my female friends. These were close relationships, and although they were never overtly erotic, I became jealous when my girlfriends had other close friends. After high school I lacked the inclination to go on to college, and no one else pushed me to do it. I drifted along, helping out with older brothers' and sisters' families and on their farms. I was fortunate to spend a year as a mother's helper to a Latter-day Saint family in Washington, D.C. Still being unsure of myself, I spent most of my time there still in a very protected LDS environment. I did not think I was capable of seeking employment with the government agencies in that area. I would call my religious upbringing practical Mormonism. Our religion was part of our everyday life, but we were not scholarly. We had family prayer but were not especially devout. I liked pioneer stories, Mormon folklore, and the stories in the church magazines. We read the scriptures but learned more from Sunday school class than from personal study. Even in Washington at that time (1954-55), most of the LDS people were transplants from rural Utah and Idaho and were only a bit more sophisticated. In more recent years I have studied Mormonism along with other religions and philosophies. To this day I am more a doer than a thinker. So how do I reconcile my religious training with my life as it has been for the past thirty years? I was always taught to go to church, listen to church leaders, study, pray, listen to the still small voice, and then "do what is right." Translated that meant—as far as my mother and the church leaders were concerned—"do as we say." Yet we were always admonished to follow our own personal revelations. In discovering my sexuality, I did this, and I have never felt wrong or guilty about it. In 1955 I enlisted in the Air Force. Still unsure of my abilities to go to school or find a job, I was in effect opting for the military patriarchal system to take care of me. In an environment where there were at least ten men to every woman, for the first time in my life lots of men were asking for dates. But life is full of surprises, and I fell in love with a woman. That first lesbian experience was a mixed bag of euphoria at being in love and fear of Air Force rules against homosexuality. Since I was a student at the base and scheduled for transfer, the relationship did not fully develop before I left, but as a result of that homosexual friendship I was discharged after fourteen months' service. I was left with a lot of ambiguous feelings, and so after finding a job in Los Angeles, I began to attend church regularly and to date men. I had had only a brief look at homosexual life, and not knowing where to meet anyone outside of a chance encounter at work (or possibly at church), I did not actively seek out other women. I had close women friends both at church and work but was not otherwise attracted to them. I did not talk to any of the priesthood leaders about this, as I did not consider that I any longer had a problem. In 1960 I met Jim at work. I dreaded the possibility of a temple recommend interview if I married an active LDS man (I intended to be honest with my future husband). But Jim was an inactive Mormon. He was not terribly upset when I told him about my Air Force experience. We married after a somewhat tumultuous courtship—we were basically reluctant but still had some desire to marry. Eventually we became parents of a son. Jim remained inactive in the church, and at his request I became inactive after about three years of marriage. Following several moves we settled in the San Francisco East Bay area in 1966. During the years of our marriage, as we both sensed that it didn't fit, the thoughts staying with me were of women. By an odd coincidence I again met the woman I had known in the Air Force. I found that my feelings had not changed, and knowing the marriage was over, I began living actively as a lesbian (though not with her). At about that time the women's movement was claiming the attention of women everywhere. Women were exploring their roles as wives, mothers, housewives, and men's sexual partners. In many cases it was as though we had awakened from a slumber to reach out into the real world, to recognize our real selves, to shed layers of socialization, and to reject the expectations of our upbringing. My partner and I became active in the women's movement and its sub-movement, the gay women's liberation groups. We attended consciousness raising groups, helped organize women's centers and bookstores, and created a new and stimulating life for ourselves. Out of this exploration came a way to define myself as a lesbian. I am a woman whose primary social, psychological, emotional, and erotic interest is with another woman. I do not dislike men, I prefer women. I think there is something in my genes, my nature that makes me this way. I do not think it is from the way my parents raised me (why me out of nine siblings?). As far as I can discern, my upbringing was essentially the same as the rest of my family and friends. I do not know how I came to be this way. If God has some scheme for me, I do not understand it. I only know I am happy with my life and am not sorry for the decisions I have made. Except for our intimate relationships, most lesbians' lives are indistinguishable from those of straight women. Many of us have been married and have children. So we work, raise our families, buy homes, pay taxes, take vacations, have hobbies, and so on. Many of us are still active church members. During all this I still retained my ties to the Mormon church. I was not active but kept an interest in the daily workings of the church. I came to recognize that a great deal of my oppression came from my upbringing in a patriarchal church. Women are the neglected and exploited majority in the church. With more women members than men, the emphasis is still on the men, since they hold the priesthood. The church's programs for working with homosexuals are directed toward gay men. Lesbians are even more invisible than gays, hardly rating a line in the manuals bishops use for counseling homosexuals. We are largely unrecognized in our relationships with other women. I am sure if you look you will find us in your wards and stakes, many in leadership positions. If we stay in the church, we often do not have children and so have more time to devote to these positions. In 1979 I heard about two groups, Mormons for ERA and Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons. I became active in both and especially in Affirmation, where I have held many leadership positions, including two years as international coordinator. We fill a need for many members of the church. Why? Because gay and lesbian members approach the church troubled and anxious and in search of compassion and understanding. Instead, we find a refusal to listen to our feelings at all levels, from apostles and church Social Services personnel and BYU professors to stake presidents and bishops. We find tunnel vision, people refusing to look beyond "sinful" behavior to see the tremendous loss of uncounted souls who would be active, contributing members if allowed to be ourselves and not forced to hide a most important facet of our personal lives. Affirmation functions as a place for us to be. There we are allowed to express our innermost selves, to function as complete human beings. I could speculate on the blind acceptance by church leaders of the mainstream Judeo-Christian definition of homosexuality and the failure of LDS scriptures to mention the subject. Church officials and members seem to depend on personal prejudices and to brush off the "problem" because the "answer" is in the Bible and in some relatively recent writings by Spencer W. Kimball and others. The church does not recognize scientific assessments of homosexuality nor the personal experiences of its own members. Talks have been given in conferences and church-wide firesides and pamphlets written which blame a poor family life. These talks must drive daggers into the hearts of parents who know this is not true but have a lovely son or daughter who was an exemplary member until his/her unconventional love surfaced. Little compassion or understanding for those parents or that person comes from untrained bishops, poorly trained counselors at church Social Services, or officials at church schools. So in recent years the only place to turn to has been Affirmation. We are a self-help support and social group. We do not try or intend to take the place of the church. In the past eight years we have been a lifeline for thousands seeking understanding and caring from others like themselves. I pray for the day when Affirmation is not needed, when we have an understanding of the plan of salvation that could include a recognition of our love, and when we have better informed and better trained church officials and members to help us sort through the pieces of the puzzles of our lives.
  • Ina Mae Murri (1935 - 2010) Obituary Logan Journal Photo
  • PRESTON, Idaho - Ina Mae Murri, 75, of Fremont, Calif., died July 17, 2010, as a result of injuries sustained in car accident in Preston, Idaho. Ina Mae and her partner, Stella Lopez-Armijo, age 76, also of Fremont, who also died from the crash, were in Preston to attend the Verl and Helen Murri Page Family Reunion at Perkins Park in Dayton, Idaho. Ina Mae and Helena came each year to attend the reunion and visit with her other siblings in Utah. Ina Mae was born January 15, 1935, and raised in Newdale, Idaho, the eighth child of John Henry and Luella Panter Murri where she spent her life until she graduated from high school. After high school, she was a nanny for a Barlow family in Washington, D.C. She then joined the Air Force, after which she worked for Western Union. She also worked in the Alameda County Public Library ad retired from the Alameda County Hospital in the Lending Library for patient services. Ina Mae married James Sanders on Sept. 2, 1960, in San Gabriel, Calif. They had one son, Eric Sanders. They were married seven years and later divorced. She is survived by her son Eric, of Honolulu, and by her siblings Lynford Panter Murri, of Laverkin, Utah; Maurice Alvin Murri, of West Jordan, Utah; Vera Atkinson, of Provo, Utah; Leda Jeffery, of Brigham City, Utah; and Helena Murri Page, of Dayton, Idaho. She was preceded in death by her parents, her brothers Cyril Jean Murri and John Hebert Murri; and Esther Murri Ehrisman. Her siblings and others whom she associated with in her life knew her as a caring, understanding, and compassionate person who reached out to help and give service to all of her associates.
    A memorial service will be held Friday, July 23, 2010, at 6 p.m. at Webb Funeral Home, 1005 S. 800 East in Preston, Idaho. 
  • Lesbian couple dies in car crash by Cynthia Laird Longtime partners Ina Mae Murri and
    Stella Lopez-Armijo & Ina Mae Murri
    Stella Lopez-Armijo died within moments of one another on Saturday, July 17 in southeast Idaho near Preston after they were involved in a car accident. Ms. Murri, who was 75, was driving to a family reunion when she suffered a massive heart attack and died at the wheel. In a heroic and courageous act, Ms. Lopez-Armijo, who was 76, grabbed the wheel and drove into a pickup truck to avoid pedestrians. She died en route to the hospital. Police said that the driver of the pickup was transported to a hospital with non-life threatening injuries. Ms. Murri and Ms. Lopez-Armijo lived in Fremont and were original founders and active in Lavender Seniors of the East Bay. The women were together for more than 35 years and were pioneers in recognition for lesbian mothers as well as role models for many in the LGBT community. The couple was also very active in Women Over Fifty and Friends. Ms. Murri was active in Affirmation, an organization for Mormons who believe in the worth of every soul regardless of their sexual or gender orientation. Ms. Lopez-Armijo was Roman Catholic. "I can't say enough about how much they helped to improve the lives of others," said Dan Ashbrook, director of Lavender Seniors. "Their ties to the community are far reaching which has always been a benefit to Lavender Seniors. They added a great deal of personality to our group programs and outreach activities. There will never be another Ina and Stella. We will miss them incredibly." Added Bobbie Jarvis, a longtime friend of the couple, "We will miss them both terribly." Jarvis said that the women met at a Pride Parade in San Francisco 35 years ago. She said that the women's trip to Idaho was to be their last trip to the annual family reunion of Ms. Murri's siblings. Jarvis said that the women loved comedy shows. Ms. Lopez-Armijo was the more outgoing – she always had a smile and a joke, Jarvis said – while Ms. Murri would often read from her extensive collection of gay literature. Ms. Murri was born on January 15, 1935. In an essay she wrote that was published in Peculiar People: Mormons and Same-Sex Orientation, she discussed her life growing up in Newdale, Idaho, a typical small Mormon town. After high school she worked as a nanny in Washington, D.C. In 1955 she enlisted in the Air Force, but wrote that she was discharged after 14 months "as a result of that homosexual friendship." She then moved to Los Angeles where she attended church regularly and dated men. She married James Sanders in 1960 but they were divorced seven years later. The couple had one son, Eric. Ms. Murri also worked in the Alameda County Public Library and the lending library for patient services at the Alameda County Hospital. Ms. Lopez-Armijo was born on March 21, 1934. In an essay she wrote for the 1995 book, From Wedded Wife to Lesbian Life, by Deborah Abbott and Ellen Farmer, she said she was born in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The family later moved to the Bay Area, not far from where she and Ms. Murri lived for 14 years. Ms. Lopez-Armijo went to work at Owens-Illinois glass container factory when she was 18. She married Harry Horten and wrote that she had four children in less than four years. The couple later divorced, but remained friends, she wrote. Ms. Murri is survived by her son Eric Sanders of Hawaii; and several siblings. Ms. Lopez-Armijo is survived by her children, Victoria Richie, Catherine Horten, Christel Cantlin, and Harry Horten III. Both women are also survived by several grandchildren and a couple of great-grandchildren. "They each loved the children of the other so it was a great big happy household," Jarvis said. The funeral mass and a reception is being held Friday, July 30 at 10 a.m. at the Transfiguration Catholic Church, 4000 East Castro Valley Boulevard in Castro Valley. The entombment is being held Saturday, July 31 at 2 p.m. at Chapel of the Chimes, 32992 Mission Boulevard in Hayward. A memorial service was held in Preston, Idaho on July 23. In lieu of flowers, donations would be appreciated to the Fisher House; Parents, Families, and Friends of Lesbians and Gays; or Lavender Seniors of the East Bay.
Mark Lawrence
2012 Mark Lawrence creates a Facebook account for his organization called Restore Our Humanity to fight marriage in equality in Utah. " In 2004 the good voters of the State of Utah were duped into voting discrimination and prejudice into the Constitution of the State of Utah by a small group of radical *mossbacks. These malicious fanatics have a long and rich history of manipulating public policy and legislation and it's time to correct these mistakes and right the wrongs. There is nothing but animus and hostility in the ammendment and it has no place in our constitution. Restore our humanity. Org is composed of citizens of Utah who embrace the principle of equality for all citizens. R.O.H does not endorse, advocate, act in accordance to or submit to any other organizations public, private or otherwise. The views, the opinions, the correspondence and the messages that originate from R.O.H are entirely our own and do not reflect or represent the opinions, views or assertions of any other organization. Restore our humanity does not represent any community organizations that act on behalf of the LGBT community or any religious or clerical organization. Restore Our Humanity does not acquiesce or accede any policies messages processes or opinions from any entity or organization that exists outside of our organization. Any opinions proposals comments or communications will be considered only through channels of our media team. 

2014 Supreme Court grants stay in Utah marriage recognition case Stay • The U.S. Supreme Court’s order prevents the state from recognizing gay marriages for now. BY JESSICA MILLER THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE Same-sex couples who wed in Utah during a 17-day window will have to continue to wait before they can receive spousal benefits. The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday granted Utah’s request to issue an emergency order preventing the state from recognizing the more than 1,000 same-sex marriages performed
Dale Kimball
in December. 
The order, which was issued about 3 p.m., said that U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball’s May ruling in the Evans v. Utah case — which said that Utah must recognize those marriages and give the same rights and privileges afforded to married opposite-sex couple — will be stayed “pending final disposition” of the states’ appeal to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. If the Supreme Court would have refused to issue a stay, the previous stay was set to expire at 8 a.m. Monday. “I believe the Court made the correct decision to issue a stay,” Utah Gov. Gary Herbert said in a statement Friday afternoon. “...Regardless of where you stand on same-sex marriage, all Utahns deserve clarity and finality when it comes to the law.” But in the decision to stay, Utah American Civil Liberties Union legal director John Mejia said those same-sex couples married last December are missing out on important spousal benefits. Had the stay not been issued, Mejia said some of the couples could have finalized their proof of adoption. They could have added their spouse to their health insurance. They could have applied for insurance discounts. But for now, they’ll continue to wait. Mejia said they are hoping to get their case expedited and heard in front of the 10th Circuit of Appeals as soon as possible. “ The quicker we can work through this recognition, the better,” Mejia said. Megan Berrett and Candice Green-Berrett were married Dec. 20. Green-Berrett is their daughter’s biological mother. In anticipation of Monday, the couple met with lawyers to ensure their papers were in order so Berrett could adopt their daughter. They did not think the Supreme Court would grant the emergency stay. “We’re very frustrated, because I think 
Candice Green-Berrett, Megan Berrett
& Quinn
we got our hopes up, and now the idea that I’m going to have to wait a year to adopt Quinn is frustrating to say the least,” Berrett said. “This is our family hanging in the balance. This is my 10-month-old daughter’s life that we’re playing with, and staying our marriage doesn’t do anything but hurt kids.” Though Mejia said he felt disappointed with the stay, he believed the Supreme Court’s Friday decision was “not at all a comment on the merits” of their case. Utah asked for the emergency order on Wednesday, saying that the state believes it will ultimately prevail in its fight to revive a ban on same-sex unions. If it loses, the state said it would work to nullify the marriages entered into during that window. However, the ACLU argued to the Supreme Court that the state should not be allowed to “effectively divorce” them by placing their unions on hold. The ACLU also said that even if the same-sex marriage ban is revived, the state will be constitutionally barred from nullifying the marriages that took place between Dec. 20, 2013, and Jan. 6, 2014. It said that “couples that do legally marry are protected by the same fundamental rights and liberty interests as any other legally married couple.” Utah continues to defend its right to define marriage as a union between one man and one woman on two fronts — in Evans. v. Utah and in the Kitchen v. Herbert case that in December toppled the state’s ban on same-sex unions. Kimball ruled in May in the Evans case that Utah must recognize and imbue all same-sex marriages performed in the state with the same rights and privileges afforded to married opposite-sex couples. His decision did not go into effect immediately to give the state time to appeal. Utah’s emergency application was filed with U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who oversees the federal court circuit of which Utah is a part and who, in January, halted the issuance of marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Utah after 17 days of marriages

2017 Terry Gillman wrote: So as a tribute to Try-Angles, since it's their 15th anniversary tonight. I was hoping the members of this group could share some fun stories about their times at the bar over the years. This bar has meant a lot to me over the years, it's been my home away from home, it's been where I've met dear friends, and laughed more than I can say. To Gene Gieber and Jesse Dowhaniuk  thank you for 15 amazing years and more to come.

1 comment:

  1. Fascinating blog. I'm glad I came across this today. I've never seen such an ambitious and comprehensive history of LGBTQ Utah. I'll be reading every day.

    ReplyDelete