Friday, March 14, 2014

This Day In Gay Utah History March 14th

14 March 
Christopher Isherwood
1929-Christopher Isherwood visited Berlin and decided to move there. His stay inspired his best-known writings. He was the author of The Berlin Stories published in 1935 about his Gay experiences in the Weimar Republic. The Musical Caberet is based on his writings.

1976  Paul Larson taught 2nd part of a course on Group Dynamics at the University of Utah entitled “Homosexuality in History and Literature” at the Campus Christian Center. The two part lecture was probably first real Gay lecture ever presented in Salt Lake City.  Lectures held Sunday evenings March 7 and 14 at 8 p.m.

1977-The New York Times criticized Gays for organizing a boycott against Anita Bryant's employer, the Florida Citrus Industry.

1977- The Venereal Disease Clinic of the Utah Health Department speaks to the Gay Consciousness Raising Group meeting at Orson Spencer Hall on the University of Utah campus. The GCR was the for runner to the Gay Student Union.

1988- "I baked cookies for the AIDS Quilt meeting tonight. In attendance were Eric Christensen, Denny McCafferty, Chuck Whyte, Ben Barr, Bruce Harmon, and Bruce Barton. We were the only ones tonight. We had a short meeting and wrote up our by-laws for our tax exempt status. Then we went up to the Governor’s Mansion for a candle Light Vigil More than 50 people held a candlelight vigil outside the gates of the Governor Mansion  to protest AIDS Bill SB 113 and HB 220.  Prayers were offered by religious leaders that  Gov. Bangerter would veto the two AIDS Bills which would require mandatory AIDS testing."  The first Utah AIDS Quilt panel displayed at candlelight vigil memorializing Michael Spence also known as Tracy Ross. Panel created by Ben Williams Different people from Gay Organizations and their non-Gay supporters met in front of the governor’s residence to protest SB 113 and HB 220. More than 50 people were there singing hymns, invoking prayers [Journal of Ben Williams]

1989 National Association for Lesbian and Gay Gerontology held their annual Conference in Salt Lake City. The conference goers attended skiing events,  symposia, workshops, at the American Society on Aging‘s Annual Conference. On Saturday over 50 attended the conference under the leadership of outgoing President Eileen Lynette. “The real fun started with the presentation by David Turner of the social events planned by his local arrangements group. Once again, we were reminded of the distinct benefits of being gay and having our own special crowd. David and our wonder hosts squired us for Saturday dinner to Café Central, the cit’s trendiest restaurant, where we learned the ropes about Utah’s

1990- Salt Lake undercover police officers joined Club 14 to monitor Gay men’s behavior in the bath house

1993 Utah Stonewall Center Board of Trustees Retreat held at the Shilo Inn. Marlin Criddle Chair. Members were Brenda Voisard, Dale Sorenson, Janet Wolf, Joe Redburn, David Ball, Gil Dickerson, and Brandon Creer.

1994 The Salt Lake Tribune Leavitt Faces Decision On Veto  of Viaticals AIDS Patients Back Bill to Legalize Sale of Life Policies  Before Death Leavitt Confronts Decision On Veto of Viaticals Bill By  Dan Harrie Utah has stepped into a stormy national debate over an  industry that trades in death benefits of terminally ill people. As it stands now, Utah is the only state that bans so-called "viatical settlements," in which dying people sell their life-insurance policies to the highest-bidding private investor. But that may be about to change. Gov.  Mike Leavitt has on his desk a bill that, if enacted, would legalize the controversial transactions. Leavitt, a former insurance company executive, is being urged by his insurance commissioner to veto the legislation. But supporters of legalizing viatical settlements -- including AIDS patients' advocacy groups -- are pushing for enactment. AIDS patients account for about 95% of the viatical business nationally. Utah's action is being watched closely by AIDS rights groups, viatical and insurance company executives and the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, which advocates strict regulation of the new industry. The governor isn't saying what he will do. "It's an issue that people are really polarized on," Leavitt spokeswoman Vicki Varela said Friday. "But it's not one he has spent a lot of time on." Polarized is an accurate description. Critics see huge potential for abuse in the so-called "death futures" business. Supporters view the issue as one of basic human rights. "This is crucial to us," said David Nelson of Gay and  Lesbian Utah Democrats. "My group represents the interests of the people who are dying. I want to be able to have my members sell their policies. We  don't have time to putz around." About half the U.S. citizens with AIDS are destitute or close to it, according to a survey by the National Association of People with AIDS. But critics like Utah Insurance Commissioner Robert Wilcox point to the big profits involved and the equally large potential for abuse. "Viatical companies are in the business to make money, not for the humanitarian aspect," said the insurance commissioner. "The terminally ill person is doing this at the most vulnerable time of his life. He is not prepared at that point to always make the decisions that will make the most sense," said Wilcox. A growing number of insurance companies offer "accelerated benefits" that allow partial payment of death benefits to terminally ill patients. The National Association of People With AIDS recommends members investigate accelerated benefits through insurance companies as well as viaticals. The organization supports legal viaticals but also has endorsed reasonable regulation. In most states, viaticals are unregulated. Life-insurance policies  are advertised in listings like those for real estate. Included for the prospective investor is the life expectancy of the seller. Profits to the investor are tied directly to the longevity of the original policy holder -- with returns highest on quick deaths. "On the average, investors through our company could reasonably expect anywhere from a 12% to an 18% percent of return," said Life Partners President Brian Pardo, among the largest viatical companies. "It's very profitable for the investors and very profitable for the people selling their policies."  Waco, Texas-based Life Partners expects to buy $150 million in death benefits this year. But Pardo rejects the stigma of "death futures" as a concoction of insurance companies. "It's a financial mechanism to allow  people to die with dignity. It's no more or less ghoulish than life  insurance," said Pardo. Rep. Pete Suazo, D-Salt Lake City, sponsored the  bill to legalize viatical settlements. He said it is a good deal for  taxpayers and those on both ends of the transaction. Legalized viatical settlements could save a good chunk of the $2.5 million in state assistance to AIDS patients spent in 1993, Suazo said. Besides, he argued, it's a private-property issue. "We don't regulate me selling you my old GMC pickup truck," said Suazo, who accuses Wilcox of "bureaucratic overreaction." Nelson is more blunt in his criticism. "The commissioner, in my opinion, is just a front to protect the insurance industry. I frankly don't trust the commissioner and his office to license or regulate this fairly," said Nelson. Nelson, Pardo and viatical supporters argue  insurance companies have billions of dollars in profits at stake because  of policies now allowed to lapse without a payout. He touched off a rancorous confrontation last July when he imposed a regulation banning viatical settlements in Utah. He said under Utah insurance laws he had no choice but to prohibit them, despite the previous practice allowing transactions. When the bill surfaced in the 1994 Legislature to  overturn his ban, Wilcox lobbied hard against it. But he said he was willing  to adopt a compromise -- ultimately rejected -- that would legalize  viatical settlements as long as they were subject to  regulation.

1996 Alleged Driver Acquitted in Firebombing Jury Acquits Alleged Driver In Firebombing  ``There's no justice anymore,''complained Luella Wakefield after a jury acquitted one of the four men accused of firebombing her South Salt Lake home. The 73-year-old widow believes the four-man, four-woman jury dared not convict Chris Thornton because they feared his connections to the drug world. ``I could see the jury was scared to death of retaliation,''Wakefield said Wednesday. ``They were afraid...Author: Stephen Hunt THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE The Salt Lake Tribune  Page: B1 [Chyna Cartier Princess Royale of the RCGSE was involved in the crime]

1999  Wasatch Mountain Bears Sunday Brunch 11am at The Olympian 2181 S 700 E;  Gay and Lesbian Political Action Committee (GALPAC) 1-3pm upper level of the  Center;  Wasatch Affirmation 5pm Ogden Viking Villa Club House 433 E 980 N enter from  450 E off 900 N; Royal Court presents "Name that Drag" 830pm at the Sun Club $5 donation  Boys impersonate the Queens

2002 Pride Day Committee Drama Another thing Pride Members, While I'm voicing my
Teinamarrie Scuderi
concerns I would like to go on record saying I'm not particularly fond of our 2002 logo.  I love our corporate logo.  I think our 2002 logo is too much.  I do enjoy Jim's work.  I have seen other pieces that are beautiful. Also what happen to us holding "Community Round Tables".  How are we to get the feedback from the community if we don't create space for it.  If the people who were coordinating this are too busy please let me know.  I am willing to step up to excellence and take it on.  I would like to see one in April. My experience is many members are anti-bar.  While I am not a big bar fan myself I know it is a huge part of the GLBT community.  The people at the bars are the ones who will be drinking in our Beer Garden, which is where we make most of our money.  We also need to work with club owners to come from a win-win situation for all of us.  I know of one club that has come to me numerous times willing to help.  I have passed this on to the committee members.  I don't know what has happen with that information.  I do know this particular club is one that we always lose our Beer Garden crowd to every year.  It has been suggested that we work with the clubs to get them to start their parties after our festivities end.  I also believe that the clubs would be willing to help us bring in a bigger mainstream headliner such as Christine W.  Although the headliner they are willing to help us bring in may not be a folk singing lesbian! I feel we would keep our crowd longer, make more money and mend bridges with the club owners.  I would love for us to eventually bring in somebody like the B-52's or whoever is bigger.  But I feel we need to start somewhere and clubs are willing to help.  We can't turn our backs on them no matter what our personal politics may be. I am just feeling very frustrated that there seems to be private meetings happening where big decisions are being made without everyone's input.  From my understanding of how boards work, Mel had I valid point about all of us being legally responsible for Pride.  I feel we need to be more respectful of each other.  It's very disheartening to me to see such an amazing talented, creative and wonderful community destroy itself and not step up to excellence.  I have seen this in other organizations in this GLBT community.  I really don't want to see it happen to us. Sincerely, Teinamarrie Volunteer Coordinator Utah Pride, Inc.

  • 2002 Sherry Booth to Chad Keller: I need some info- Chad- Did Donna JW approach you with info about our exec meeting regarding Mel? How much did she actually tell you? I have been told that she went to the Arts Festival meeting last night and told Robin (and who knows who else) about what has surfaced about Mel. I need to be sure I know exactly what she is divulging before we call her in. Thanks Sherry.
  • From Chad Keller to Sherry Booth: I had Called her. I thought where as Katheryn and I
    Chad Keller
    were doing the Laughing Stock show that It might be wise to seek out her contribution to a Count Down party geared toward families....I had been offered a hotel pool for a Saturday afternoon and thought she might want to help with one party to make money for the parade and kids area.....I had also called to see if she had a contact for the gay parents group
      so they could be surveyed.  We had an hour and a half conversation about what we need to get done and how she left the parents group....she was quite nice, and expressed that she told you all that I should be the person to do out Community Outreach as she and she felt everyone was on burn out.....due to the Friday party .....We briefly discussed FR and talked about how scary it is getting....And it was mentioned indirectly that  the EC has stepped in and that all would be taken care of at the next meeting.  But the conversation was rather obvious as you and I have talked. CK.
  • From: "Sherry Booth" To: Chad Keller: Subject: Hmmm Interesting. Your e-mail appears to have a different tone than our Phone conversation. Alright. Well, we will handle all of the drama and intensity that is happening now at the meeting on Monday. Which, by the way will be called as a closed meeting. That means voting members only. There are way too many people with mis-perceptions about how things are and how they should be. We will address every single concern that has been mentioned through these e-mails and the "talk" we keep hearing about. The bottom line, however, is that way too much conversation is taking place outside of the organization and outside of certain people's position. (I have addressed Teinamarrie. She is SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO out of line, but I'll let Kathryn handle that one. I refuse to protect her any longer...) So, before that meeting we will speak as an EC with Mel & Donna. I'll report the outcome to the board. In the meantime, you can call me with questions or concerns and I'll be happy to talk to you. But, please do not send or reply to e-mails discussing Pride business until things  have settled down. Sherry.
  • From: "Ryan Schippers" Good Morning fellow Pride Members, I have to agree with Teinamarie also. I’m also feeling very frustrated. I was appointed this new position for Youth activities  and no one has came to me with what needs to be done, how much I can spend, what insurance requirements if any are needed for events I may have, nor was I told that my budget was due on this coming Monday until Chad spoke to me about it. I really do want this to work and be the best pride ever, especially for the youth. Which in the past, pride has left them out in the dark. I have a lot of ideas, but when I have no budget, it's hard for me to make my contacts and try to get the best deal that is out there. Also I  have to  agree  with Teinamarie on the issue with people leaving early because they have homework, like them I have homework also, I also work fulltime and go too school fulltime, but I made a commitment and I will keep that commitment and I would ask the rest to do the same. I have no problem with committing a Saturday or Sunday to a retreat. Ryan Schippers.
  • From: Sherry Booth Subject: Please stop! Ryan, Teina, Chad and everyone else included in this e-mail downpour ~Please stop! This is as unproductive as it can be and it is extremely destructive. Not one of you has any more invested in this organization than the others involved. We are ALL trying to do our jobs. Some of the things at hand just have to take priority over others. Everyone can not be answered or helped at once. Even if the preference is for instant gratification. If you have questions about what is happening, that is why we have meetings and why you send in reports each month. Bring your questions - and answers to those of others - on Monday. Ryan - You are new to this board. Your questions are valid, but I would expect that your first real meeting next week would be the time to ask them. No one is deliberately avoiding or forgetting to give you information. For the rest of you - I will provide the time you need to address your concerns on Monday. Until then please stop this barrage of negativity.  It simply perpetuates drama that we do not need. Sherry Booth Co-Chair Utah Pride, Inc.
  • From Mel [Nimer]  to Sherry [Booth] and Billy [Lewis]:  Sherry & Billy; Stop what? Now
    Mel Nimer
    I'm getting very nervous about this whole situation. When the co-chairs can't or aren't willing to listen to their Board ask questions and to respond accordingly then what does that say about the co-chairs. I really respect both you and Billy, and appreciate all that you are trying to do to make this celebration work, but you are not the only ones involved. And, as trustees, we have the right and legal responsibility to question what is happening, and to wonder why we are not getting the information that you both are required to disseminate to your fellow trustees. Is there something underhanded going on? Meetings behind everyone's back? Decisions being made without the approval of the Board? Maybe someone can clue me in as to all this "unproductive" open discussion and what it really means. I'm all ears. It would really be nice to know what is happening before we get to the meeting on Monday, so that we can come prepared to discuss it rather than being hit broadside with it and not have time to understand it. Please open up and share with us all what is taking place here. Your fellow trustee Mel Sponsorship Chair Utah Pride, Inc.

Marlin Criddle
2004 - The idea is absurd- After listening to legislators and others say that same-sex marriage somehow threatens traditional marriage and hearing no valid reasons for this opinion, I hoped to see a reasoned response from Paul T. Mero, president of the Sutherland Institute. Sadly, after reading the article (Tribune, March 7) I am again disappointed that no one seems to be able to articulate any compelling reason to believe that same-sex marriage constitutes any threat.  According to Mero the "real threat of homosexual marriage" is that it is an inauthentic, unnatural version of marriage. Even if you accept this premise, would this confuse people? Would it make people insecure in their own relationships? The very idea is absurd. People are not stupid. Mero's argument, carried to its logical conclusion, also says that other forms of currently recognized family relationships are inauthentic. To Mero, marriage is about two things only: bearing children and raising children. According to this view, families with adopted children, step-children, children born with the assistance of reproductive technology, or no children at all are as inauthentic as families with same-sex partners as parents.  The truth of the matter is that families of whatever stripe are authentic where love, nurturance, caring and support are present. And same-sex couples, from what I have seen, are just as good, if not better, than traditional couples. I challenge Mero to show otherwise.    Marlin G. Criddle    Salt Lake City

2004 I really want to know In the interest of honest debate, can anyone answer the following questions concerning the amendment to ban same-sex marriages?  Will the amendment encourage those not married to get married, to stay married and to be more successful in marriage? Will it prevent those who marry from perpetrating abuse, abandonment and neglect? Will it cause those who marry to reproduce (or reproduce more)? Will it make those who marry appreciate their marriages (and their spouses) more? Will it eradicate homosexuality from our society? Will it prevent gays and lesbians from forming committed relationships? Will it prevent them from having and adopting children? Will it prevent them from creating families? Will it protect children of gay/lesbian or straight parents? Will it make a constructive difference in the lives of Americans? Will it add any rights (not already promised) to our Constitution? Will it do anything except assault the constitutional right of equal protection under the law or will it classify discrimination as a constitutional right? Please, will someone help me understand? I really want to know. Laurie Wood Orem

2004  In April 23, 2003 Todd Dayley of the Pillar forwarded this article to Chad Keller and me regarding a national move to preserve regional history. Salt Lake City has had a Gay historical society since 1988 under various names; the most recent the "Utah Stonewall Historical Society". The Utah Stonewall Center once housed an amazing collection of material gathered and categorized mostly by Russell Kracke and myself from 1991-1997. The late Jay Bell and myself had saved a remnant of it and it is setting uncategorized at the Marriott Library presently. Chad Keller, the energizer bunny of Salt Lake, has revitalized the historical society and has an amazing vision of recreating a permanent archive. I hope that you will read this article and ask yourself what you can do to help be part of the "glue that holds this communitytogether." Ben Williams USHS Director
  • FEATURE: Is the Past Newsworthy? Gay Publications Take Up History as a Community Project by Matt-Allen Pearcey Managing editor Andrew Rapp began his career at Boston's Bay Windows not by looking forward, but by slipping into the past. The paper's 20th anniversary prompted Rapp, who snagged the top job late last year, to check out the olden days. "Our readers are appreciative of our history. They want to look back on our lives to see openly gay council members elected, laws passed to protect us, and instances of injustice we've overcome. It's not just filler," said Rapp. Rapp said truth is the best defense against comments like those of Minnesota State Representative Arlon Lindner, who in early April said that gays had not been persecuted in the Holocaust. "The importance of having our history, the fact that it has been as well documented as it has been, helps us to contradict erroneous statements by people like him [Lindner]," says Rapp. "We can demonstrate that he is wrong by using information from the [United States] Holocaust Memorial Museum and from other archives focused on LGBT people." Bay Windows inaugurated a half-page weekly "The Way We Were" section in its February 24 issue. A number of other publications are taking a look back into history as well - like Chicago's Windy City Times, and the national glossy The Advocate, which regularly features history from its own pages. South Florida's TWN runs a half-page titled "Through Time." TWN managing editor Bill Green said 26 years of newspapers are easily accessible in bound volumes. Others take their past even more seriously. At one point, the Toronto offices of Pink Triangle Press devoted 100 square meters (about 1,000 square feet) to archives, packed floor to ceiling. Pink Triangle Press is now a not-for-profit business with publications in three Canadian cities, but it started out as a collective of volunteers publishing The Body Politic (TBP), a small but influential magazine. Company president Ken Popert pinpoints the interest in history to TBP's 1973-74 exploration of the history of the German gay-rights movement. Said Popert: "We believed that it was important for gays and lesbians to know that we had stepped out of the timeless closet and onto the stage of history, where people can and do change things, at least once before, to know that every issue we faced had been debated in another language on another continent a hundred years before." Around the same time, a TBPer and manic collector founded the Canadian Gay Archives, designating as historical documents a few shelves of books sent to the magazine for review and the publication's back files. The archives eventually became a separate legal entity. Pink Triangle Press housed the records until 1989 and continues to send all its files to what is now a large and impressive collection. The press donates $500 a month to help with expenses. But few newspapers have those kinds of resources. In Oregon, the managing editor of Just Out does history the quick and easy way. Marty Davis pulls together eight tidbits from the past every two weeks, by simply going through an issue published exactly 10 or 15 years ago. "I look for familiar names, for things that overlap with what's happening now. It takes anywhere from 15 to 30 minutes." Davis also insists on bigger history features at least once a quarter. Something in an old issue will catch her eye, or she'll meet someone with a good knowledge of the past at "one of the 10,000 meetings I go to a month." For example, Portland has a group that caters to the needs of gay and lesbian seniors. Her advice to other editors is, "Just listen, and ask questions." The president of the local gay and lesbian archives in Portland, Pat Young, contributes occasional pieces. "Every paper should be so lucky as to have one of her," said Davis. Ideas also come from local walking tours and the old daily papers, found on microfilm at the public library. That's how Just Out's recently published tale of Dr. Marie Equi came about. A famous lesbian antiwar activist in the 1920s, she was thrown into San Quentin for treason, adopted a child, and referred to herself as queer in a time long before its meaning was reclaimed. Said Davis: "It's important that we honor our past, show our roots. We should record the passions of activists, their sacrifices, and the sacrifices of those who have helped get us where we are today. We use Stonewall as the benchmark, but this is only a drop in the bucket. We'll go back as far back as we can go to find an embryo of a gay historical event or trailblazer." The office manager is responsible for archiving old issues. And the University of Oregon is helping put the newspaper onto microfiche. But Davis still keeps copies of older issues in her home - just in case. Said Davis: "Our newspapers are reporting today's events, and by doing so they are documenting tomorrow's history. We are the glue that holds this community together."

Sheri Dew
 2004 Anti-Gay Coalition Meets Near Washington DC Mormon Leader Compares Gay Rights Movement to the Rise of Hitler The escalation of anti-gay rhetoric and actions reached another high as leaders of Family Action Council International, a conservative religious coalition, met February 28 near Washington DC in a visitors center belonging to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS or Mormons). In one of the most hate-ridden moments of the event, Sheri Dew, President of the LDS-owned Deseret Book, likened those who do not oppose gay marriage to those who did nothing to oppose Hitler's rise to power.  Ms. Dew, who is unmarried and has never raised children, also described a picture of a same-sex couple with infants which she saw in Newsweek magazine. She said, in disgust, "I just can't stomach this--the thought of those girls being raised in that kind of a setting."  Meridian Magazine later reported her remarks as being that she was "heartsick"--a more genteel version of  her actual remarks. (In an ironic twist, one of the grooms Dew was decrying turned out to be Eric Ethington, a fellow Mormon
Eric Ethington
who served an LDS mission in Korea. Explaining why he and his partner decided to marry, Ethington said, "It wasn't about the politics, or the civil disobedience, or the social activism... It was about our love for each other and our love for our family." Some of the comments made by other speakers had sexist or racist overtones. Rabbi Daniel Lapin presented this explanation of why men must marry: "Without marrying women, males form gangs and steal hubcaps. Men raised with no faith become either savages or wimps." Patrick Fagan, of the Heritage Foundation, noted that while "inner city" women are having lots of babies, mostly out of wedlock, "white" births are below the replacement level. Observers find it ironic that LDS leaders, who in the past have been so persecuted and excluded for practicing an alternative family model (polygamous families), could be now so invested in condemning and making illegal another alternative family model (same-sex couples). This irony became apparent in the comments of Gerald McDermott, professor of theology at
Roanoke College, who remarked that one should not use the love between two people to justify same sex marriages. "If love were the only test, one could justify polygamy," he said to a largely LDS audience.
  • 2004 Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons Responds As members of Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons, we want to express our outrage at recent comments made by Sheri Dew, president of LDS-owned Deseret  Book, during a February 28 meeting near Washington DC. We agree with LDS Church president Gordon B. Hinckley when he says that families are under attack.  But when we see LDS leaders provoke disgust at our families, spend millions of dollars so that we will never be able to marry, and lobby so that our children will never have two legal parents, we arrive at a different conclusion about who is the aggressor and who are the victims. We encourage the Church to strengthen families by counseling members to create happier marriages resulting in less divorce, by combating spousal abuse, and by other sensible means. But we challenge any religious leader to demonstrate how same-sex marriage will be detrimental to the American family. Olin Thomas, Alyson Bolles, James Morris, and Hugo Salinas Executive Committee Affirmation: Gay and Lesbian Mormons
 2005  The Metro's Fabby, well that unfortunately will debut in 2006 at a major sponsor's request, who graciously is helping with trademark issues.  (Dont want to run into the same problem a local publication who will remain nameless is currently experiencing...some best of Utah thing)  The major sponsor is working with us and two other major contributors to pick up some of the associates fees.Thanks! Chad Keller

  • 2006  James Hicks Fwd: HRC staff brings you news you can't live without Just in-case some of you don't receive these, I found this one very interesting.  Something that caught my attention was the fact that the FDA is finally rethinking its absurd ban on Gay and/or Bi-Sexual Men donating blood.  Perhaps someone realized AIDS is not just a gay disease.  This ban always made me wonder if they really test all the blood they obtain from donors.  I understand that the question of testing blood has become a big concern.  I starting asking that question years ago and have yet to receive a solid answer from any nurse or Dr on the subject.   This seems like such a simple question,  "Is all blood tested for the AIDS virus?" Yes or No?  They always respond with.  "well.... we do look at certain risk factors."  I take that as a NO. Anyone have any thoughts?
  • 2006 posted by Kim Burgess Re: [gay_forum_utah] Fwd: HRC staff brings you news you can't live without  My understanding is that AIDS does not show up in the blood until 3 months after infection.  The donated blood is tested, but AIDS won't show up on the test if the person is recently infected.  I think they also don't want you to donate blood if you've had a tattoo recently.  It's been a while since I donated blood, but that was my memory. --Kim

John Cooper 
2018 John Cooper, who was active in the early days of Salt Lake’s gay community, died Wednesday morning of pancreatic cancer. He was diagnosed with stage four pancreatic cancer in early February and announced he likely had days, not weeks, to live. He had surgery for bladder cancer in 2016. Cooper was a behind-the-scenes supporter of many LGBT organizations in the early 80s and was executive director of Salt Lake Affirmation, a group for gay and lesbian Mormons, in the late 80s until he left the state to take a job with Intel. Graveside services will be held Saturday, March 24 at 2 p.m. at the Logan City Cemetery. His gravesite will be next to his parents’ grave on the north central side. An informal memorial service will be held afterward at one of the LDS churches on the west side of Logan.

No comments:

Post a Comment